Privacy, internet and pluralist democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21056/aec.v23i92.1810Palavras-chave:
privacy, security, transparency, feminism, law and economics, NSA.Resumo
The aim of this study is to discuss some important criticism of digital rights, in particular of the right to privacy, by feminist and law economics scholars.Then,its relation to security and transparency is proposed. In particular, I argue that such theoretical lenses would help shed light on recent cases concerning controversial surveillance leaks, which highlight the deficiency of legitimacy as well as of the jurisdiction and ethical agency of leading democratic states: e.g. The NSA scandal. Finally, I will criticize this approach and will highlight some real treats to the fundamental rights when I consider the possibility of a pluralist democracy in the dimension of the Internet.
Referências
Albu, Oana Brindusa; Flyverbom, Mikkel. “Categories and dimensions of organizational transparency”, paper presented at the 3rd Global Conference on Transparency Research, Paris, October 24-26, 2013.
Alexy Robert, “The Dual Nature of Law”, Ratio Juris 23, 2010, pp. 167-182.
Alexy, Robert. A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1989.
Alexy, Robert. “On the Concept and the Nature of Law”, Ratio Juris 21, 2008, pp. 281-299.
Alexy, Robert. La natura del diritto. Per una teoria non-positivista.ESI: Napoli, 2015.
Allen, Anita. Unpopular Privacy. Oxford University Press: New York, 2011.
Amoroso Fernández, Yarina; Sassi, Manuela.“Una esperienza multidisciplinare: la storia costituzionale cubana”.In Ciampi, C.; Marinai E.Il diritto nella società dell’informazione,edited by, Istituto per la Documentazione Giuridica del CRN: Firenze, 1998.
August, Vincent; Osrecki, Fran. “Transparency Imperatives: Results and Frontiers of Social Science Research”. In: August, V., Osrecki, F. (eds) Der Transparenz-Imperativ: Normen, Strukturen, Praktiken. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2019, pp. 1-34.
August, Vincent; Osrecki, Fran. (eds). Der Transparenz-Imperativ: Normen, Strukturen, Praktiken. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2019.
Barabási, Albert. L. Link. La nuova scienza delle reti.Einaudi: Torino, 2004.
Barak, Aharon. Proportionality Constitutional Rights and their Limitations. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2012.
Berlin, Isaiah. Four essays on liberty. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1969.
Bloustein, Edward J. “Privacy as an Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser”, N.Y.U.L. Rev. 39, 1964, pp .962-1007.
Calabrò, A. Rita; Grasso, Laura. Dal movimento femminista al femminismo diffuso.Milano: Franco Angeli, 2009.
Casadei, Thomas (ed.). Donne, diritto, diritti. Prospettive del giusfemminismo. Torino: Giappichelli, 2015.
Castells, Manuel. The Internet Galaxy, Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2001.
Castells, Manuel. The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban Regional Process. Blackwell: Oxford and Cambridge, 1989.
Cavarero, Adriana. “Presentazione” in MacKinnonCatharine., Soltanto parole. Milano: Giuffrè, 1994, pp. I-X.
Choi, Jay J.; Sami, Heibatollah (eds.). Transparency and governance in a global world. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 2012.
Clarke, Roger. “Internet Privacy Concerns Confirm the Case for Intervention”. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 42, 2, 1999, pp. 60 -67.
Cohen, Gerald Allan. Self-ownership, freedom, and equality. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge,1995.
Constant, Benjamin. Political writings edited by Fontana Biancamaria. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1988.
Cooley, Thomas. Treatise on the Law of Torts. Callaghan: Chicago, 1880.
Copelon, Rhonda. “Unpacking Patriarchy: Reproduction, Sexuality, Originalism And Constitutional Change”, in Lobel Jules (ed.), A Less Than Perfect Union: Alternative Perspectives On The U.S. Constitution, Monthly Review Press: New York.1988.
De Minico, Giovanna. Internet. Regola e anarchia.Jovene: Napoli, 2012.
DeCew, Judith Wagner. In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics, and the Rise of Technology. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, New York, 1997.
Durante, Massimo. Il futuro del web: etica, diritto, decentramento. Dalla sussidiarietà digitale all’economia dell’informazione in rete. Torino: Giappichelli, 2007.
Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 1986.
Ellis, Mark. “Losing Our Right to Privacy: How Far is Too Far?”. Birkbeck Law Review 2, 2, 2014, pp. 173-190.
Faralli, Carla. “Donne e diritti. Un’introduzione storica”. In: Casadei, Thomas (ed.).Donne, diritto, diritti. Prospettive del giusfemminismo. Torino: Giappichelli, 2015, pp. 1-13.
Fineman, Martha Albertson. “Feminist Legal Theory”.Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law 13, 1, 2005, pp. 13-23.
Finley, Lucinda M. “Transcending Equality Theory: A Way Out of the Maternity and the Work-Place Debate”, Colum. L. Rev. 86, 1986, pp. 1118-1182.
Floridi, Luciano. “Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy”. Ethics and Information Technology 8, 3, 2006, pp.109 - 119.
Fried, Charles. An Anatomy of Values: Problems of Personal And Social Choice. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 1970.
Fried, Charles. Privacy [a moral analysis]. In: Schoeman, Ferdinand David (Ed.). Philosophical dimensions of privacy an anthology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge,1984, pp. 203 - 222.
Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 1982.
Gordon, Linda. “The Struggle for Reproductive Freedom: Three Stages of Feminism”. In: Eisenstein, Zillah R. (ed.). Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism, 1979.
Himma, Kenneth Einar. “Privacy vs Security: Why is not an Absolute Value or Right”.San Diego Law Review 44, 2007, pp. 859-922.
Hood, Christopher. “What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance?”.Public Management Review 9, 2, 2007, pp. 191-210.
Lefebvre, Henri. Il diritto alla città. Ombre Corte: Verona, 2014.
MacCormick, Neil. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1978.
MacCormick, Neil. The Artificial Reason and Judgment of Law.Recthstheorie, Beiheft 2: Berlin, 1981.
MacKinnon, Catharine. A. “Privacy V. Equality: Beyond Roe V. Wade”. In: MacKinnon, Catharine. A. (ed.) Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law, Harvard University Press: Cambridge.1987.
Manganaro, Francesco. “L’evoluzione del principio di trasparenza amministrativa”. Astrid Rassegna 105, 22, 2009, pp. 1-13.
Marmor, Andrei. “What Is the Right to Privacy?”.Philos Public Aff. 43, 2015, pp. 3-26.
Marongiu, Daniele. Organizzazione e diritto di Internet. Giuffré: Milano, 2013.
Marrama, Roberto. “La pubblica amministrazione tra trasparenza e riservatezza nell’organizzazione e nel procedimento amministrativo”, Dir. proc. amm., 1989, pp. 416 e ss.
Marx, Karl. Capital: Critique of political economy, Vol. 1:A Critique of Political Economy. Penguin Classics: London, 2004.
McClain, Linda C. “The Poverty Of Privacy?”,Colum. J. Gender & L. 3, 1, 1992, pp. 119-174.
Morelli, Alessandro. “I diritti e la Rete. Notazioni sulla bozza di Dichiarazione dei diritti in Internet”. Federalismi.it – focus TMT 1, 2015, pp. 1- 19.
Moreso, Josep Joan; Navarro, Pablo Eugenio; Redondo, María Cristina. “Argumentación jurídica, lógica y decisión judicial”. Doxa 11, 1992, pp. 247-262.
Morrone, Andrea. “Internet come spazio pubblico costituzionale. Sulla costituzionalità delle norme a tutela del diritto d’autore deliberate dall’Agcom”. Federalismi.it – focus TMT 3, 2014, p.1-6.
Nino, Carlos Santiago. El Constructivismo ético, Centro de Estudios Constitucionales: Madrid, 1989.
Nussbaum, Martha. Rawls and feminism in The Cambridge companion to Rawls, edited by Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2002.
Okin, Susan. Justice, gender, and the family. Basic Books Inc: New York, 1989.
Osrecki, Fran. “Fighting corruption with transparent organizations: Anti‐corruption and functional deviance in organizational behavior”. Ephemera 15, 2, 2015, pp. 337‐364.
Pateman, Carole. “Self-ownership and property in the person: Democratization and a tale of two concepts”. The Journal of Political Philosophy 10, 1, 2002, pp. 20-53.
Pattaro, Enrico - Sartor Giovanni, 2002. Norms, Laws and the Internet, Paper presented to “II Congreso mundial de derecho inoformático”, Madrid, 23- 27/09/2002.
Pattaro, Enrico. “La filosofia del diritto di fronte all’informatica giuridica”. In: Jellamo Anna; Riccobono Francesco (eds.)In ricordo di Vittorio Frosini, Milano: Giuffrè, 2004.
Pollicino, Oreste; Bertolini, Elisa; Lubello, Valerio. Internet: regole e tutela dei diritti fondamentali. Aracne: Roma, 2013.
Posner, Richard A. “The right of privacy”. Georgia Law Review 12, 3, 1978, pp. 393-422.
Pulido Bernal, Carlos. El principio de proporcionalidad y los Derechos Fundamentales. Universidad del Externado de Colombia: Bogotá, 2014.
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press: New York, 2005.
Richardson, Janice. “The Changing Meaning of Privacy, Identity and Contemporary Feminist Philosophy”. Minds & Machines 21, 4, 2011, p. 517 - 532.
Rodotà, Stefano. Il mondo nella rete. Quali diritti, quali vincoli. Laterza: Roma-Bari, 2014.
Stamile Natalina. “Sicurezza vs Privacy” in Persio Tincani (ed.) Diritti e futuro dell’Europa, l’Ornitorinco, Milano, 2020.
Stamile Natalina, Gianluca Andresani. “Transparency in Internet Regulation and Governance: Arguments and Counter-Arguments with some Methodological Reflections”. RevistaBrasileira de EstudosPolíticos, 117, 2018, pp. 443-476.
Stamile, Natalina. “Appunti su femminismo e teoria del diritto. Una rassegna”. Ordines: Per un sapere interdisciplinare delle istituzioni europee 2, 2016, pp. 301-329.
Stamile, Natalina. “Nehuma, uma, cem mil vozes de mulheres. Discutindo Donne, Diritto, Diritti. Prospettive del Giusfemminismo de Thomas Casadei”, Revista Direitos Sociais e Políticas Públicas (UNIFAFIBE), v. 6, n. 2, 2018, pp. 401-419.
Stamile, Natalina. “Igualdad, diferencia y teoría feminista”. Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, 18, 2020, pp. 9-28.
Stein, Laura W. “Living with the Risk of Backfire: A Response to the Feminist Critiques of Privacy and Equality”.Minnesota Law Review 77, 1993, pp. 1152 - 1191.
Tavani,Herman T. “Philosophical Theories of Privacy: Implications for an Adequate Online Privacy Policy”. Metaphilosophy 38, 1, 2007, pp. 1-22.
Warren Samuel D.&Brandeis Louis D. “The right to privacy”.Harvard Law Review 4, 5, 1890, pp. 193-220.
Ziccardi, Giovanni. Informatica giuridica. Milano: Giuffrè, 2006.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
