Personal data protection and State surveillance: the risks of digital discrimination and Federal Supreme Court’s vision
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21056/aec.v22i90.1658Keywords:
personal data protection, state surveillance, informative self-determination.Abstract
This article proposes an examination of the changes that have taken place in the organization of society in the face of the advancement of new mechanisms of monitoring and state surveillance, with the objective of identifying the dangers arising from them and the risks that a new digital discrimination entails for fundamental rights. Based on a dialectical analysis, we move on to the study of the necessary transformations of consent, revisiting the classic civil law institute, now in the wake of the new General Law for the Protection of Personal Data (Law nº. 13.709/2018). Subsequently, we move on to the study of the impact brought about by the decision rendered by the Federal Supreme Court in the legal analysis of ADI (Direct Action of Unconstitutionality) nº. 6.389/DF, which deemed the provisions contained in Provisional Measure nº 954/2020 and recognized the existence, in our national legal system, of the fundamental right to informative self-determination that, with the approval of EC (Constitutional Amendment) 115/22, was inserted in art. 5, LXXIX as a fundamental right to personal data protection. Finally, it concludes by the necessary structuring of the National Data Protection Authority (ANPD), provided for in article 55-A of the LGPD (General Law for the Protection of Personal Data), representing its creation as an instrument that materializes the objective dimension of this fundamental right.
References
ALCALÁ, Humberto Nogueira. Autodeterminación informativa y Hábeas Data en Chile y información comparativa. In: Anuário de Derecho Constitucional Latinoamericano, 2005, p. 449 – 471, p. 452.
ANDRADE, José Carlos Vieira de. Os direitos fundamentais na constituição portuguesa de 1976. 3 ed. Coimbra: Almedina, 2006.
BECKER, Ulrich. La sociedade Del riesgo: hacia una nueva modernidad. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1998.
BIONI, Bruno Ricardo. Proteção de Dados Pessoais: a função e os limites do consentimento. Rio De Janeiro: Forense, 2019.
BRAZIL. Superior Electoral Court. Resolution nº 22.688 of December 13, 2007. Regulated the procedures for updating the electoral register, resulting from the implementation, on an experimental basis, of a new form of voter identification, through the incorporation of biometric data from all voters. Available at: http://www.tse.jus.br/eleitor/biometria/informacoes-sobre-o-planejamento-da-biometria-2017-2022. Access in jun. 2022.
BRAZIL. Law nº 13.709 of August 14, 2018. General Law for the Protection of Personal Data (LGPD). Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/l13709.htm. Access in jun. 2022.
BRAZIL. Federal Supreme Court (Plenary). Referendum in Precautionary Measure in ADI 6.387/DF. Minister Rosa Weber. May 7, 2020. Available at: https://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=5895165. Access in jun. 2022.
BUCHNER, Benedikt. Informationelle Selbstbestimmung im Privatrecht. Mohr Siebeck, 2006.
BURGIN, Victor. Jenni’s Room: Exhibitionism and solitude. In: LEVIN, Thomas Y.; FROHNE, Ursula; WEIBEL, Peter (org.). Ctrl space: rethorics of surveillance from bentham to big brother. Karlsruhe: ZKM, 2002.
CORREA, Adriana Espíndola. Lei de Proteção de dados e a identificação nacional: há antinomias? CONJUR, 2019. Available at: https://www.conjur.com.br/2019-fev-18/direito-civil-atual-lei-protecao-dados-identificacao-nacional-antinomias. Access in jun 2022.
CUNHA, Paulo Ferreira. A Constituição viva: cidadania e direitos humanos. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2007.
DONEDA, Danilo. Da privacidade à proteção de dados pessoais: elementos da formação da Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados. 2ª ed. São Paulo: Thomson Reuters Brasil, 2019.
FLAHERTY, David. Visions of privacy: Past, present and future. In: BENNETT, Colin; GRANT, Rebecca. Visions of privacy: policy choices for the digital age.Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999.
GANDY, Oscar. The surveillance society: information technology and bureaucratic social control (1989) Journal of Communication, 39:3.
GEDIEL, José Antônio Peres; CORRÊA, Adriana Espíndola. Proteção jurídica de dados pessoais: a intimidade sitiada entre o Estado e o mercado. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal do Paraná, n. 47, p.141-153, 2008.
GOLDMAN, Janlori. Privacy and Individual Empowerment. In: ENNETT, Colin; GRANT, Rebecca. Visions of privacy: policy choices for the digital age. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999, p. 109.
HAMMERSCHMIDT, Denise. Intimidade genética & Direito da Personalidade. Curitiba: Juruá, 2008.
HARTMANN, Ivar. Ecodemocracia: a proteção do meio ambiente no ciberespaço. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2010.
INFORMATION COMMISSIONER OFFICE. A Report on the Surveillance. United Kingdon, September, 2006. Available at: https://ico.org.uk/media/about-the-ico/documents/1042390/surveillance-society-full-report-2006.pdf. Acccess in May 18, 2022.
KUSKONMAZ, Elif Mendos; GUILD, Elspeth. Covid-19: A New Struggle over Privacy, Data Protection and Human Rights? Available at: https://europeanlawblog.eu/2020/05/04/covid-19-a-new-struggle-over-privacy-data-protection-and-human-rights/. Access in jun. 2022.
LACAN, Jacques. El estadío del espejo como formador de la función del yo (je) tal como se nos revela en la experiencia psicoanalítica. In: Escritos I. México, Siglo XXI, 1984. Available at: https://arditiesp.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/lacan_estadio_del_espejo.pdf. Accces in jun. 2022.
LYON, David. Surveillance as social sorting – Computer codes and mobile bodies. In: LYON, David (org.). Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk and digital discrimination. New York: Routledge, 2003.
MAÑAS, José Luis. Códigos de conducta y espacio digital. Especial referencia a la protección de datos. La revista de la Agencia de Protección de Datos de la Comunidad de Madrid, ISSN 1988-1797, nº. 44, 2010.
MARX, Gary T. Ethics for the new surveillance. In: BENNETT, Colin J.; GRANT, Rebecca (org.). Visions of privacy: policy choices for the Digital Age. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999.
MENDES, Carlos Helder Carvalho Furtado. Tecnoinvestigação Criminal: entre a proteção de dados e a infiltração por Software. Salvador: Editora JusPodivm, 2020.
MENDES, Gilmar Ferreira; COELHO, Inocêncio Mártires. Hermenêutica constitucional e direitos fundamentais. Brasília: Brasília Jurídica, 2002; PEREIRA, Jane Reis Gonçalves. Interpretação constitucional e direitos fundamentais. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2006.
MENDES, Laura Schertel. Privacidade, proteção de dados e defesa do consumidor: linhas gerais de um novo direito fundamental. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2014.
MENDES, Laura Schertel. Decisão histórica do STF reconhece direito fundamental à proteção de dados pessoais. JOTA Info, 10/05/2020. Available at: https://www.jota.info/opiniao-e-analise/artigos/decisao-historica-do-stf-reconhece-direito-fundamental-a-protecao-de-dados-pessoais-10052020. Access in jun. 2022.
MICHAEL, Lothar. Pressfreiheit und Schutz der Privatsphäre im Spiegel nationalen und spezifisch europäischen Verfassungsrechts. Jahrbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart. Mohr Siebeck: 2005.
MOLINARO, Carlos Alberto. Direito ambiental – proibição de retrocesso. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2007.
POUDRIER, Jennifer. “Racial” categories and health risks> epidemiological surveillance among Canadian First Nations. In: LYON, David (org.). Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk and digital discrimination. New York: Routledge, 2003.
RHEINGOLD, Howard. The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic
frontier. Cambridge -MA: The MIT Press, 2000.
RIOS, Roger Raupp. Direito antidiscriminação: discriminação direta, indireta e ações afirmativas. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2008.
RODOTÀ, Stefano. A vida na sociedade de vigilância: a privacidade hoje. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2008.
RUARO, Regina Linden; RODRIGUEZ, Daniel Piñeiro; FINGER, Brunize. O direito à proteção de dados pessoais e a privacidade. Revista da Faculdade de Direito (UFPR), v. 53, 2012.
SALES, Lea Silveira. Posição do estágio do espelho na teoria lacaniana do imaginário. Revista do Departamento de Psicologia da Universidade Federal Fluminense, vol.17 nº 1 Niterói Jan./Jun 2005, p. 113-127, p. 125.
SARLET, Ingo Wolfgang. A eficácia dos direitos fundamentais: uma teoría geral dos direitos fundamentais na perspectiva constitucional. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2010.
SARMENTO, Daniel. A dimensão objetiva dos direitos fundamentais: fragmentos de uma teoria. Arquivo de direitos humanos. v.4, 2002, p. 63-102.
SAAVEDRA, Giovani Agostini; SOBOTTKA, Emil Albert. Introdução à Teoria do Reconhecimento de Axel Honneth. Civitas – Revista de Ciências Sociais, v. 8, n. 1, jan/apr, 2008, p. 9-18.
SCHWABE, Jürgen; MARTINS, Leonardo (Org.). Cinqüenta anos de jurisprudência do Tribunal Constitucional Federal Alemão. Berlim: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung E.V., 2005, p. 238.
SCHMIDT-BURKHARDT, Astrit. The All-Seer. In: LEVIN, Thomas Y.; FROHNE, Ursula; WEIBEL, Peter (org.). Ctrl space: rethorics of surveillance from bentham to big brother. Karlsruhe: ZKM, 2002.
TERWANGNE, Cécile de. Is a global protection regulatory model possible? In: GUTWIRTH, Serge; POULLET, Yves, et. al. (Org.). Reinventing data protection? Bruxelas: Springer, 2009, p. 175 – 189, p. 185.
UNITED NATIONS. International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination. Available at: http://www.dhnet.org.br/direitos/sip/onu/discrimina/lex81.htm. Acccess in jun. 2022.
UNITED NATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. December 18, 1979. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-elimination-all-forms-discrimination-against-women. Access in jun, 2022.
VIEIRA, Tatiana Malta. O direito à privacidade na sociedade de informação: efetividade desse direito fundamental diante dos avanços da tecnologia da informação. Porto Alegre: Sergio Antonio Fabris Editor, 2007, p. 194.
WILSON, Lydia R. JD, MA, CPP and MCCREIGHT, Robert Ph.D. Public Emergency Laws & Regulations: Understanding Constraints & Opportunities. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management: 2021, Vol. 9: Iss. 2, Article 7. DOI: 10.1515/1547-7355.2034.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the A&C - Administrative & Constitutional Law Review the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see theEffect of Open Access).
