Brazil’s distinct brand of religious liberty: an example to the world, not without its challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21056/aec.v18i71.935Keywords:
Constitutional Law, Religious Liberty, Religious Freedom, French Laïcité, IntoleranceAbstract
Brazilian scholars, politicians, legal practitioners, and judges consistently refer to Brazil as a lay state, suggesting a type of secularism similar to French laïcité. However, in practice, the interaction between government, religion, and society in Brazil more closely resembles religious freedom in the United States. Among the twenty-six most populous countries, Brazil has the lowest governmental restrictions on religious freedom. The Brazilian government protects religious liberty through extensive constitutional and statutory provisions, as well as numerous international conventions. Notwithstanding these governmental protections, the country has recently experienced a dramatic increase in social hostilities directed toward people of faith. Thus, while Brazil is an example to the world with regard to minimal governmental restrictions on religious liberty, both the government and Brazilian citizens must find ways to minimize social hostilities and religious intolerance. This paper compares religious liberty in Brazil to French laïcité and U.S. religious freedom, explores governmental protections of religion in Brazil, exposes the growth of social hostilities towards religious groups in Brazil, highlights the work of government and grassroots organizations to turn back this rising tide of religious intolerance, and offers several suggestions on how the Brazilian government might further decrease social hostilities.References
AÇÃO EDUCATIVA. Acordo Entre Brasil e Vaticano Ameaça o Estado Laico e as Liberdades Fundamentais, July 7, 2009.
ASSESSORIA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS E DIVERSIDADE RELIGIOSA. Relatório Sobre Intolerância e Violência Religiosa no Brasil (2011–2015): Resultados Preliminares (Report on Religious Violence and Intolerance in Brazil (2011 – 2015): Preliminary Results), 8, 2016.
ASSOCIATION FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM & BUSINESS. Global Business & Interfaith Peace Awards – Rio 2016, <http://alrn.org.br/premios-globais/> , last visited Jan. 3, 2017, 8:49 PM.
BARBOSA, Rogério. Justiça Condena TV Bandeirantes Após Considerar Preconceituosos Comentários de Datena Contra Ateus. UOL, January 31, 2013, <http://televisao.uol.com.br/noticias/redacao/2013/01/31/justica-condena-tv-bandeirantes-apos-considerar-preconceituosos-comentarios-de-datena-contra-ateus.htm.>
BAUBÉROT, Jean. The Place of Religion in Public Life: The Lay Approach. In: Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: a Deskbook, 441, n. 1, 2004.
BRAZILIAN INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS. 2010 Census: Number of Catholics drops and number of the evangelicals, spiritualists and without religion increases, Jun. 29, 2012, <http://censo2010.ibge.gov.br/pt/noticias-censo?id=3&idnoticia=2170&t=censo-2010-numero-catolicos-cai-aumenta-evangelicos-espiritas-sem-religiao&view=noticia>
CAVALCANTE, Aroldo. Intervenção do Estado na Propriedade: O Problema da Requisição de Espaço Religioso Para Uso Público, Working Paper.
COMMISSION TO COMBAT RELIGIOUS INTOLERANCE. About Us. <http://ccir.org.br/quem-somos/>, last visited Jan. 3, 2017, 8:08 PM.
CRISTALDO, Heloisa. SDH Cria Comitê de Combate à Intolerância Religiosa (SDH Creates Committee to Combat Religious Intolerance). AGÊNCIA BRASIL, Jan. 22, 2013, <http://memoria.ebc.com.br/agenciabrasil/noticia/2013-01-22/sdh-cria-comite-de-combate-intolerancia-religiosa.>
DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS OF MAN – 1789, <http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/rightsof.asp>, last visited Jan. 4, 2017, 7:15 PM.
DIBUONO, Vivian. “Hardly half a percent of the country practices” Afro-Brazilian religions. Jyan Blog, October 18, 2011, Diverse Religious History Informs Much of Brazil’s Catholicism.
DURHAM, W. Cole; SMITH, Robert. Brief History of Religious Freedom in the United States. In: Religious Organizations and the Law, § 2:1, West, 2013.
ECK, Diana L. A New Religious America: How A “Christian Country” Has Become the World’s Most Religiously Diverse Nation. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 2001.
FONSECA, Francisco Tomazoli da. Religião e direito no século XXI: a liberdade religiosa no estado laico. Curitiba: Juruá, 2015.
Frente Parlamentar em Defesa da Liberdade Religiosa Será Lançado em Brasília (Parliamentary Front in Defense of Religious Liberty Will Be Initiated in Brasília). OAB SÃO PAULO, Aug. 07, 2015, <http://www.oabsp.org.br/noticias/2015/08/frente-parlamentar-em-defesa-da-liberdade-religiosa-sera-lancada-em-brasilia.10289.>
Frente Parlamentar Para a Liberdade Religiosa do Congresso (Mista). CÂMARA DOS DEPUTADOS, Feb. 26, 2015, <http://www.camara.leg.br/internet/deputado/frenteDetalhe.asp?id=53457>
GRIM, Brian J. Brazil: A Lesson in the Peaceful Navigation of Religious Change. Tony Blair Faith Foundation. April 20, 2015. <http://tonyblairfaithfoundation.org/religion-geopolitics/commentaries/opinion/brazil-lesson-peaceful-navigation-religious-change>
GUNN, T. Jeremy. Religious Freedom and Laïcité: a Comparison of the United States and France, Brigham Young University Law Review, Provo, n. 2, p. 419-506, 2004.
LE GOFF, Jacques; RÉMOND, René, eds. Histoire de la France religieuse: Du Roi très chrétien à la laïcité républicaine, XVIIIe - XIXe siècle. t. 3. Paris: Seuil, 2001.
Menina Vítima de Intolerância Religiosa Diz Que Vai Ser Difícil Esquecer Pedrada. GLOBO, June 16, 2015 [hereinafter Attack on Young Girl], <http://g1.globo.com/rio-de-janeiro/noticia/2015/06/menina-vitima-de-intolerancia-religiosa-diz-que-vai-ser-dificil-esquecer-pedrada.html.>
MORMONNEWSROOM.ORG. Facts and Statistics – Brazil, <http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/facts-and-statistics/country/brazil> , last visited Jan. 5, 2017, 7:54 PM.
OAB SÃO PAULO. Estudo Apresentado em Seminário Aponta Aumento da Intolerância Religiosa no Brasil, Dec. 5, 2016, <http://www.oabsp.org.br/noticias/2016/12/estudo-apresentado-em-seminario-aponta-aumento-da-intolerancia-religiosa-no-brasil.11403.>
OAB SÃO PAULO. Estudo Apresentado em Seminário Aponta Aumento da Intolerância Religiosa no Brasil, Dec. 5, 2016, <http://www.oabsp.org.br/noticias/2016/12/estudo-apresentado-em-seminario-aponta-aumento-da-intolerancia-religiosa-no-brasil.11403.>
OAB SÃO PAULO. Objetivos – Direito e Liberdade Religiosa, Sept. 3, 2015, <http://www.oabsp.org.br/comissoes2010/liberdade-religiosa/objetivos/Objetivos%20-%20Direito%20a%20Liberdade%20Religiosa.pdf/download.>
OAKS, Dallin H. Separation. Accommodation and the Future of Church and State. DePaul Law Review, Chicago, v. 35, n. 1, 1985.
OAS.ORG. American Convention on Human Rights “Pact of San Jose, Costa Rica” (B-32), Signatories and Ratifications, Jan. 6, 2017. <http://www.oas.org/dil/treaties_B-32_American_Convention_on_Human_Rights_sign.htm.>
ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES – DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW. American Convention on Human Rights “Pact of San Jose, Costa Rica” (B-32), Nov. 22, 1969. <http://www.oas.org/dil/treaties_B-32_American_Convention_on_Human_Rights.pdf.>
PAUL VI, Declaration Dignitatis Humanae. Dec. 7, 1965. <http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii-vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651207_dignitatis-humanae-en.html>
PEW Research Center. Restrictions on Religion Among the 25 Most Populous Countries, 2007-2014, June 23, 2016. <http://www.pewforum.org/interactives/restrict5-scatter/>
Projetos de Lei e Outras Proposições: PEC 99/2011. Câmara dos Deputados, <http://www.camara.gov.br/proposicoesWeb/fichadetramitacao?idProposicao=524259> , (last visited Jan. 8, 2017, 9:56 PM.
RANQUETAT JÚNIOR, Cesar Alberto. A Invocação do Nome de Deus nas Constituições Federais Brasileiras: Religião, Política e Laicidade. Revista Cultura Y Religión, v. 7, n. 2, p. 86-101, jun./dez., 2013.
ROBERT, Paul. Le Grand Robert De La Langue Française, 915. 2. ed. 1992.
ROUSSEAU, Jean-Jacques. Du contrat social. Ed. B. de Jouvenel. Geneva: C. Bourquin, 1947.
SCHARFFS, Brett G. Religious Majorities and Restrictions on Religion, Notre Dame Law Reviewm, South Bend, v. 91, n. 4, p. 1419-1435, 2016.
Secional Paulista da Ordem Lança Manifesto Contra a Intolerância Religiosa na Internet. OAB SÃO PAULO, Nov. 16, 2015, <http://www.oabsp.org.br/noticias/2015/11/secional-paulista-da-ordem-lanca-manifesto-contra-a-intolerancia-religiosa-na-internet.10507.>
SOARES, Rafael. Traficantes Proíbem Candomblé e Até Roupa Branca em. O Globo, Sept. 10, 2013, <http://oglobo.globo.com/rio/traficantes-proibem-candomble-ate-roupa-branca-em-favelas-9892892.>
STECK, Juliana. Intolerância Religiosa É Crime de Ódio e Fere a Dignidade, April 16, 2013, Jornal do Senado, <http://www12.senado.leg.br/jornal/edicoes/2013/04/16/intolerancia-religiosa-e-crime-de-odio-e-fere-a-dignidade>
TELLES, Edward. Racial Discrimination and Miscegenation: The Experience in Brazil. UN Chronicle, v. XLIV, n. 3, Sept. 2007, <https://unchronicle.un.org/article/racial-discrimination-and-miscegenation-experience-brazil/>
The ARFB, Association for Religious Liberty and Business, Unites Professionals from the Legal, Business, Academic, and Political Sectors, Among Others, With the Common Goal of Promoting Religious Liberty. Association for Religious Freedom & Business, <http://alrn.org.br/alrn/> , last visited Jan. 3, 2017, 11:12 PM.
THEBRAZILBUSINESS.COM. Introduction to the Brazilian Constitution, <http://thebrazilbusiness.com/article/introduction-to-the-brazilian-constitution>, last visited Jan. 7, 2017, 4:35 PM.
TIMSIT, Annabelle, The False Illusion of the Melting Pot, Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, & World Affairs (Georgetown University). Jyan Blog, December 8, 2015, <https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/posts/the-false-illusion-of-the-melting-pot>; see also <http://web2.sbg.org.br/congress/sbg2008/pdfs2008/23959.pdf>
U.S. Dep’t Of State – Bureau Of Democracy, Human Rights, & Labor, Brazil 2015 International Religious Freedom Report 3, 2015. <https://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/religiousfreedom/index.htm?year=2015&dlid=256337#wrapper>
U.S. DEP’T OF STATE – BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, & LABOR. International Religious Freedom Report 2002: Introduction, Oct. 7, 2002, § 2, <http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2002/13607.htm.>
UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS – OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER, Status of Ratification Interactive Dashboard, Ratification of 18 International Human Rights Treaties, <http://indicators.ohchr.org>, last visited Jan. 6, 2017, 7:06 PM.
UNITED NATIONS, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Dec. 16, 1966. <http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/ccpr.pdf.>
UNITED NATIONS. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 18, Dec. 10, 1948. <http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/eng.pdf.>
UNITED STATES. The Declaration Of Independence, 1776, para. 2, <https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript>
V-BRAZIL.COM. Brazil Constitution, Recent Constitutional Amendments, <http://www.v-brazil.com/government/laws/recent-amendments.html> , last visited Jan. 9, 2017, 8:00 PM.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the A&C - Administrative & Constitutional Law Review the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see theEffect of Open Access).