Judicial review of administrative action in the United States

Autores/as

  • Richard Albert Boston College Law School
  • Anna Nikolayeva Boston College Law School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21056/aec.v17i70.827

Palabras clave:

judicial review, administrative state, judicial deference, New Deal, United States Constitution.

Resumen

In this article, the authors explain and evaluate the judicial review of administrative action under the United States Constitution. After discussing the birth of the administrative state, the authors introduce and analyze the forms of judicial review of administrative action as well as the origins and variable degree of judicial deference to administrative action. The authors close with a discussion on the future of judicial review of administrative action in the United States.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Richard Albert, Boston College Law School
    Professor at Boston College Law School (Newton, USA); as of January 1, 2018, Professor at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law (Austin, USA). Juris Doctor – J.D. (Yale University). Master of Laws – LL.M. (Harvard University). Bachelor of Civil Law – B.C.L. (Oxford University). E-mail: richard.albert@bc.edu.
  • Anna Nikolayeva, Boston College Law School
    J.D. Candidate, Class of 2018, Boston College Law School (Newton, USA). E-mail: nikolaya@bc.edu.

Referencias

CALLAHAN, Maureen B. Must Federal Courts Defer to Agency Interpretations of Statutes? A New Doctrinal Basis for Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, WIS. L. REV., p. 1275, 1991.

CUSHMAN, Barry. Court-Packing and Compromise. CONST. COMMENTARY, n. 1, p. 29, 2013.

ELIAS, Roni A. The Legislative History of the Administrative Procedure Act. FORDHAM ENVTL. L. REV., n. 27, p. 207, 2016.

FLETCHER, William A. The Structure of Standing. YALE L.J., n. 98, p. 221, 1988.

FRIENDLY, Henry J. “Some Kind of Hearing”. U. PA. L. REV., n.123, p. 1267-1272, 1975.

HENNING, Peter J. Gorsuch Nomination Puts Spotlight on Agency Powers. N.Y. TIMES: DEALBOOK Feb. 6, 2017. Available at: < https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/06/business/dealbook/gorsuch-nomination-puts-spotlight-on-agency-powers.html>

KEARNEY, Joseph D.; MERRILL, Thomas W. The Great Transformation of Regulated Industries Law COLUM. L. REV., n. 98, p. 1323, 1998.

LANDIS, JAMES. THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS, n.154, 1938.

LEVIN, Ronald M. The Anatomy of Chevron: Step Two Reconsidered. CHI.-KENT L. REV., n. 72, p. 1253-1254, 1997.

MCCUBBINS, Matthew D. Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies. VA. L. REV., n. 75, p. 431, 1989.

MERRILL, Thomas W. Textualism and the Future of the Chevron Doctrine. WASH. U. L.Q., n. 72, p. 351, 1994.

MERRILL, Thomas W. Capture Theory and the Courts: 1967-1983. CHI.-KENT L. REV., n. 72, p. 1039-, 1997.

METZLER, Edward L. the growth and development of administrative law. MARQ. L. REV., n.19, p. 209-211, 1935.

PIERCE JR, Richard J. Chevron and Its Aftermath: Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Statutory Provisions. VAND. L. REV., n. 41, p. 301, 1988.

RABIN, Robert L. Federal Regulation in Historical Perspective. STAN. L. REV., n. 38, p. 1189-1197, 1986.

RUBIN, Edward. It's Time to Make the Administrative Procedure Act Administrative. CORNELL L. REV., n. 95, p.108, 2003.

SCHWARTZ, Bernard. The Administrative Agency in Historical Perspective. IND. L. J., n. 36, p. 263, 1961.

SHEPHERD, George B. Fierce Compromise: The Administrative Procedure Act Emerges from New Deal Politics. NW. U. L. REV., n. 90, p. 1557, 1996.

STARR, Kenneth W. Judicial Review in the Post-Chevron Era. YALE J. ON REG., n. 3, p. 283, 1986.

STRAUSS, Peter L.The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch. COLUM. L. REV., n. 84, p. 573, 1984.

SUNSTEIN, Cass R. Constitutionalism After the New Deal. HARV. L. REV., n. 101, p. 421, 1987.

SUNSTEIN, Cass R. Law and Administration After Chevron. COLUM. L. REV., n. 90, p. 2071, 1990.

WILSON, James Q. The Politics of Regulation. THE POLITICS OF REGULATION, n. 357, p. 385, 1980.

Descargas

Publicado

2017-12-01

Número

Vol. 17 Núm. 70 (2017): octubre/diciembre

Sección

Artigos

Licencia

Autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:

  1. Autores mantienen los derechos autorales y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con el trabajo simultáneamente licenciado bajo la Creative Commons - Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional que permite compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de la autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
  2. Autores tienen autorización para asumir contratos adicionales separadamente, para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en esta revista (ej.: publicar en repositorio institucional o como capítulo de libro), con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
  3. Autores tienen permiso y son estimulados a publicar y difundir su trabajo online (ej.: en repositorios institucionales o en su página personal) a cualquier punto antes o durante el proceso editorial, ya que esto puede generar alteraciones productivas, así como aumentar el impacto y la citación del trabajo publicado (Véase El Efecto del Acceso Libre).

Cómo citar

ALBERT, Richard; NIKOLAYEVA, Anna. Judicial review of administrative action in the United States. A&C - Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional, Belo Horizonte, v. 17, n. 70, p. 13–23, 2017. DOI: 10.21056/aec.v17i70.827. Disponível em: https://revistaaec.com/index.php/revistaaec/article/view/827. Acesso em: 23 feb. 2025.