Biases, Heuristics, and Emotions in constitutional judges: An Examination of the Peruvian Constitutional Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21056/aec.v25i102.2040Keywords:
decision-making; heuristics; biases; emotions; constitutional courtAbstract
Since the end of the last century, various empirical investigations have shown that individual decisions are not always within the parameters of an expected rationality; on the contrary, judgments and decisions are often not rational. Our decisions are often influenced by supposedly irrelevant external factors such as heuristics, biases and emotions. This paper explains that these external factors are present in the decisions of magistrates of ordinary justice and constitutional judges, focusing the analysis on some decisions of the Peruvian Constitutional Court.
References
ACCIARRI, Hugo. Derecho, economía y ciencias del comportamiento. Buenos Aires: Ediciones SAIJ de la Dirección Nacional del Sistema Argentino de Información Jurídica, 2019.
BANDES, Susan A; BLUMENTHAL, Jeremy A. Emotion and the law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, California, v. 8, p. 161-181, dec. 2012
CAMERER, Colin. Behavioral economics: Reunifying psychology and economics. Perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, California, v. 96, n. 19, p. 10575-10577, sep. 1999. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10575.
CARPIZO, Jorge. El tribunal constitucional y el control de la reforma constitucional, Instituto de investigaciones jurídicas, Ciudad de México, v. 42, n. 125, p. 735-794, may./ago. 2009. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-86332009000200006.
CASTRO M., Alexandra; HERNÁNDEZ A., Zabrina; RIQUELME M., Elisa; OSSA C., Carlos; AEDO S., Jaime; DA COSTA D., Silvia; y PÁEZ R., Darío. Nivel de sesgos cognitivos de representatividad y confirmación en estudiantes de Psicología de tres universidades del Bío-Bío. Propósitos y Representaciones, Lima, v. 7, n. 2, p. 210-224, may./ago. 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n2.245.
CHOQUE LIMACHI, Gary Vilena. Informe jurídico sobre STC 1-2023-PHC-TC. “Caso Muro de la Vergüenza”. Lima, 2024. 117 f. Tesis (Trabajo de suficiencia profesional para optar el Título de abogado) - Facultad de Derecho, PUCP. https://tesis.pucp.edu.pe/server/api/core/bitstreams/6ca294ab-45e9-4af3-8849-6892beaf8f71/content.
DANZIGER, Shai; LEVAV, Jonathan; y AVNAIM-PESSO, Liora. Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, New York, v. 108, n. 17, p. 6889-6892, feb. 2011. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018033108.
DIAZ REVORIO, Francisco Javier. Tribunal Constitucional y procesos constitucionales en España: Algunas reflexiones tras la reforma de la Ley Orgánica del Tribunal Constitucional de 2007, Estudios Constitucionales, Santiago, v. 7, n. 2, p. 81-108, nov. 2009. http://www.estudiosconstitucionales.cl/index.php/econstitucionales/article/view/223.
EGUIGUREN PRAELI, Francisco. Los Tribunales Constitucionales en la Región Andina: Una visión comparativa. Derecho PUCP, Lima, n. 53, p. 7-64, dic. 2000. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.200001.001.
GARCÍA DE ENTERRÍA, Eduardo. La posición jurídica del Tribunal Constitucional en el sistema español: posibilidades y perspectivas. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, Madrid, v. 1, n. 1, p. 35-131, ene./abr. 1981.
GONZÁLES LAGIER, Daniel. Emociones sin sentimentalismo. Sobre las emociones y las decisiones judiciales. Lima: Palestra, 2020.
GUTHRIE, Chris; RACHLINSKI, Jeffrey J.; WISTRICH, Andrew J. Blinking on the bench: How judges decide cases. Cornell Law Faculty Publications, Ithaca, v. 93, n. 917, p. 1-43, nov. 2007. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/917/.
HANOCH, Yaniv. Neither an angel nor an ant: Emotion as an aid to bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Psychology, [s.l.], v. 23, n. 1, p. 1-25, feb. 2002. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167487001000654.
HUERTA GUERRERO, Luis; Tribunal Constitucional del Perú y conflicto de poderes. Derecho PUCP, Lima, n. 90, p. 415-461, jun./nov. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202301.012.
KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Barcelona: Debate, 2013.
LANDA ARROYO, César. Tribunal Constitucional y Estado Democrático. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 1999. https://doi.org/10.18800/9789972421754.
LERNER, Jennifer S.; LI, Ye; VALDESOLO, Piercarlo; KASSAM, Karim S. Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, San Mateo, v. 66, p. 799-823, jan. 2015. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043.
LOAIZA, Pamela. La judicialización de la política en el Perú: Una observación del Tribunal Constitucional y sus decisiones frente a la píldora del día siguiente (2001-2010). Politai, v. 4, n. 7, p. 179-195. 2013. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/politai/article/view/13904/14527.
McGLURG, Andrew Jay. The rhetoric of gun control. American University Law Review, Washington, v. 42, n. 1, p. 53-113, sep. 1992. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr/vol42/iss1/2/.
MITIDIERO, Daniel. Cortes Superiores e Cortes Supremas. Do controle à interpretação da jurisprudência ao precedente. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2013.
MORENO CRUZ, Diego. Acción intencional e interpretación judicial: casos normales y sorpresivos. En: ARENA, F.; LUQUE, P.; y MORENO, D. (Eds.). Razonamiento jurídico y ciencias cognitivas. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, jul. 2021. p. 101-128. https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/server/api/core/bitstreams/1012d3be-8ca7-4292-9bc6-0090a54fc3e1/content.
PÉREZ, Javier. Curso de Derecho Constitucional. 11ª ed. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2007.
PETTYS, Todd. The emotional juror. University of Lowa Legal Studies Research Paper, Lowa City, v. 76, n. 08-01, p. 1609-1640, jan. 2008. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1038641.
RACHLINSKI, Jeffrey J.; y WISTRICH, Andrew J. Judging the judiciary by the numbers: Empirical research on judges. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, v. 13, n. 203-29, p. 1-44, oct. 2017. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085032.
RESTREPO, John. Tribunales constitucionales: dinamizadores en la construcción de la democracia contemporánea para John Rawls. Cuestiones constitucionales, Ciudad de México, n. 21, p. 233-249, jul./dic. 2009. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-91932009000200008&lng=es&tlng=es.
ROSAS, Omar. La estructura disposicional de los sentimientos. Ideas y Valores, Bogotá, v. 59, n. 145, p. 5-31, ene./abr. 2011. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-00622011000100001&lng=pt&nrm=iso.
SOTOMAYOR TRELLES, José Enrique. Emoción, racionalidad y argumentación en la decisión judicial. Derecho PUCP, Lima, n. 79, p. 151-190, 2017. doi: 10.18800/derechopucp.201702.008.
SUNSTEIN, Cass; THALER, Richard; y BALZ, J. Arquitectura de decisiones. IUS ET VERITAS, Lima, v. 22, n. 44, p. 386-401, 2012. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/12042.
THALER, Richard. Behavioral economics: Past, present and future. American Economic Review, v. 106, n. 7, p. 1577-1600, jul. 2016. doi: 10.1257/aer.106.7.1577.
THALER, Richard. La Psicología económica. Madrid: Planeta, 2016.
THALER, Richard H.; SUNSTEIN, Cass R. Un pequeño empujón (Nudge): El impulso que necesitas para tomar mejores decisiones sobre salud, dinero y felicidad. España: Taurus, 2009.
TUZZET, Giovanni. L’analisi economica come argomentazione giuridica. Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea, Rio de Janeiro, v. 3, n. 2, p. 97-122, jul./dic. 2018. https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/article/view/21920.
TVERSKY, Amos; KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, New Series, New York, v. 185, n. 4157, p.1124-1171, sep. 1974. https://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~schaller/Psyc590Readings/TverskyKahneman1974.pdf.
UCÍN, María Carlota. ¿Jueces sensibles? Una introducción al análisis del rol de las emociones en la decisión judicial. Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, Alicante, n. 45, p. 191-219, jun. 2022. doi:10.14198/DOXA2022.45.07.
VINX, Lars. The guardian of the constitution. Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the limits of constitutional law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. www.cambridge.org/9781107092686.
ZORZETTO, Silvia; y FERRARO, Francesco. Legislación y Nudging: Hacia una definición adecuada. In: OLIVER-LALANA, Daniel. Legislación en serio: Estudios sobre derecho y legisprudencia. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2019. p. 223-263. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=919896.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dennis José Almanza Torres, Alisson López Caballero
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the A&C - Administrative & Constitutional Law Review the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see theEffect of Open Access).
