Globalization and convergence in judicial review: what can we learn from the case of Brazil?

Authors

  • Eduardo Jordão FGV DIREITO RIO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21056/aec.v17i69.837

Keywords:

judicial review, comparative law, convergence, dominance, globalization

Abstract

This paper offers one way to verify the existence of dominant convergence trends in the market of legal ideas. By looking through the history of judicial review in Brazil, it aims to sketch some intuitions on the changing influences that can be spotted in such market. Being a peripheral jurisdiction and a traditional importer of legal ideas and doctrines, Brazil is relatively open to foreign influences and international trends. It is, in this sense, a good proxy of any domination occasionally being exerted. Thus, paying attention to the evolution of judicial review in Brazil can be a way to identify global developments.

References

ADENAS, Mads; FAIRGRIEVE, Duncan. Intent on making mischief: seven ways of using comparative law. In: MONATERI, Pier Giuseppe (ed.). Methods of Comparative Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012. p. 28.

ALMEIDA, Fabricio Antonio Cardim de (coord.). Revisão judicial das decisões do conselho administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE). Belo Horizonte: Fórum, 2011.

ANTHONY, Gordon et alli. Introduction to the collection. In: Gordon Anthony et alli (ed.). Values in global administrative law. Oxford and Portland: Hart, 2011.

BERMANN, George. Comparative Law in Administrative Law. In: L’État de Droit: Mélanges en l’honneur de Guy Braibant. Paris: Dalloz, 1996.

BINENBOJM, Gustavo; CYRINO, André Rodrigues. Parâmetros para a revisão judicial de diagnósticos e prognósticos regulatórios em matéria econômica. In: SOUZA NETO, Cláudio Pereira de; SARMENTO, Daniel (coord.). Vinte anos da Constituição Federal de 1988. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2009, p. 739-760.

CASSESE, Sabino. Le problème de la convergence des droits administratifs: vers un modèle administratif européen? In: L'État de Droit: Mélanges en l'honneur de Guy Braibant. Paris: Dalloz, 1996.

CUSTOS, Dominique. Independent administrative authorities in France: structural and procedural change at the intersection of Americanization, Europeanization and Gallicization. In: ROSE-ACKERMAN, Susan; LINDSETH, Peter (ed.). Comparative Administrative Law. Edward Elgar Pub., 2011.

D’ALBERTI, Marco. Administrative law and the public regulation of markets in a global age. In: ROSE-ACKERMAN, Susan; LINDSETH, Peter (ed.). Comparative Administrative Law. Edward Elgar Pub., 2011, p. 75.

FAGUNDES, Miguel Seabra. O controle dos atos administrativos pelo poder judiciário. 8. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2010, p. 89-90.

JORDÃO, Eduardo. Le juge et l’administration: entre le contrôle et la déférence. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2016.

JORDÃO, Eduardo; ROSE-ACKERMAN, Susan. Judicial Review of Executive Policymaking in Advanced Democracies: Beyond Rights Review. Administrative Law Review, v. 66, p. 1-72, 2014.

MELLERAY, Fabrice. Les trois âges du droit administratif comparé ou comment l'argument de droit comparé a changé de sens en droit administratif français. In: MELLERAY, Fabrice (dir.). L'argument de droit comparé en droit administratif français. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2007.

MENDONÇA, José Vicente Santos de. Conceitos inventados de direito administrativo. Revista Brasileira de Direito Público, Belo Horizonte, a. 14, n. 53, abr/jun 2016.

PERLINGEIRO, Ricardo. Uma perspectiva histórica da jurisdição administrativa na América Latina: tradição europeia-continental versus influência norte-americana. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, Curitiba, v. 2, n. 1, p. 89-136, jan./abr. 2015.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-01

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 69 (2017): July/September

Section

Artigos

License

Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the A&C - Administrative & Constitutional Law Review the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
  2. Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see theEffect of Open Access).

How to Cite

JORDÃO, Eduardo. Globalization and convergence in judicial review: what can we learn from the case of Brazil?. A&C - Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional, Belo Horizonte, v. 17, n. 69, p. 23–31, 2017. DOI: 10.21056/aec.v17i69.837. Disponível em: https://revistaaec.com/index.php/revistaaec/article/view/837. Acesso em: 7 jan. 2025.