Crítica de la comparación constitucional “ad hoc”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21056/aec.v14i55.101Keywords:
Comparación “ad hoc”, isomorfismos, “talcualismo”, fragmentación de los espacios jurídicos, educación crítica.Abstract
Este artículo resume las características de los métodos de comparación constitucional, que prevalecen en el estudio de los fenómenos de globalización y derecho transnacional. La comparación de "casos" y "problemas", fundada sobre "dialogue" y "cross-fertilization", sin discutir de las "causas" de las diferencias en la fragmentación de los espacios jurídicos, produce una actitud intelectual de "praesumptio similitudinis" y de "talcualismo", que el autor define comparación "ad hoc", porque funcional a las condiciones geopolíticas y económicas preconcebidas y por ello perjudicial en la educación crítica del jurista global.Downloads
Published
2014-01-15
Issue
Section
Artigos
License
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the A&C - Administrative & Constitutional Law Review the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see theEffect of Open Access).
How to Cite
CARDUCCI, Michele. Crítica de la comparación constitucional “ad hoc”. A&C - Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional, Belo Horizonte, v. 14, n. 55, p. 13–22, 2014. DOI: 10.21056/aec.v14i55.101. Disponível em: https://revistaaec.com/index.php/revistaaec/article/view/101. Acesso em: 7 jan. 2025.