The Italian Judiciary between Constitution and European Law: Autonomy, Independence, Impartiality and Protection of Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21056/aec.v24i95.1913Keywords:
Judiciary; autonomy; independence; impartiality; protection of rightsAbstract
The Italian Constitution, the European Law and the European Convention on Human Rights, contain the basic principles that, together with implementing legislation, ensure effective judicial protection of people's fundamental rights and freedoms and contribute to shape the rule of law. These are the guarantees of the right todefence, due process of law, natural judge, irremovability of judges, and in particular the guarantees of autonomy, independence and impartiality, which are recognisedto the Judiciary and individual magistrates, above all through the creation of autonomous governing bodies for ordinary and special magistracy, the selection of magistrates by public examination (apart from a few exceptional cases), limitations on the right of magistrates to take part in political, associative and other activities.The necessary co-operation between national judges and the Court of Justice of the European Unionplays an equally essential role to protect people's fundamental rights. The need to fully guaranteeand the inability of the legislator to protect adequately them has determined, over the years, a progressive extension of judges' powers. It produced, on one hand, tensions with Political Power, mainly due to the degenerative effects of the associative phenomenon among magistrates, on the other,long duration of judgments.The judicial reform law no. 71 of 2022 attempted to repair, at least partially, the problem of the politicisation of Judiciary. This law is one of the reforms included in the extensive National Recovery and Resilience Plan, launched in 2021, which pursues, among other fundamental objectives, that of reducing the times of Justice, mainly by the reorganisation of judiciary offices and the digitalisation of Justice, whose results are still awaited.
References
AUTORI VARI, Associazionismo giudiziario. Questione Giustizia, Roma, n. 4, p. 176-226, out./dez. 2015.
BIN, Roberto; PITRUZZELLA, Giovanni. Diritto costituzionale. 23. ed. Torino: Giappichelli, 2022.
BIONDI, Francesca. Ordinamento giudiziario: novità, attese e prospettive. federalismi.it, Roma, n. 6, p. iv-xiv, Editoriale 8 de março de 2023.
BRUTI LIBERATI, Eugenio. Il modello costituzionale di ordinamento giudiziario: Csm e associazionismo giudiziario. Questione Giustizia, Roma, p. 1-11, 24 de outubro de 2022.
CAMPANELLI, Giuseppe; PANIZZA, Saulle. Alcune osservazioni a prima lettura sulla riforma dell’ordinamento giudiziario del 2022, tra novità e questioni ancora aperte. Osservatorio AIC, Torino, n.1, p. 129-158, jan./fev. 2023.
CAPUTO, Angelo, Le funzioni del Consiglio superiore della magistratura tra riserva di legge e poteri normativi. Forum di Quaderni costituzionali. Rassegna, Bologna, vol. 1, p. 222-247, jan./març. 2020.
CASSESE, Sabino. Quelle toghe fuori ruolo minano l’indipendenza della magistratura. Il Dubbio, Roma, 18 de maio de 2023.
CELENTANO, Claudio. L’autonomia e indipendenza della magistratura ed il Consiglio superiore della magistratura nella giurisprudenza costituzionale. https://www.cortecostituzionale.it/studiRicerche.do, Roma, p. 1-38, mar. 2015.
DE GRAZIA, Luciana. Le garanzie costituzionali dell’indipendenza della magistratura nell’esperienza francese, italiana e spagnola. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica, 2023.
DE GRAZIA, Luciana. Alcune riflessioni sull’indipendenza giudiziaria nel contesto europeo. Nuove Autonomie, Napoli, n. 1, p. 87-113, jan./abr. 2023, p. 91.
FERRI, Giampietro. Articolo 104. In: CLEMENTI, Francesco; CUOCOLO, Lorenzo; ROSA, Francesca; VIGEVANI, Giulio Enea (Coord.). La Costituzione italiana, 2. vol. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2021.
GROPPI, Tania; SIMONCINI, Andrea. Introduzione allo studio del diritto pubblico e delle sue fonti. 4. ed. Torino: Giappichelli, 2017.
LENAERTS, Koen. New Horizons for the Rule of Law Within the Eu. German Law Journal, Cambridge, vol. 21, n. 1, p. 29-34, jan. 2020.
MELIS, Guido. Le correnti nella magistratura. Origini, ragioni ideali, degenerazioni. Questione Giustizia, Roma, 10 de janeiro de 2020.
PACE, Alessandro. I poteri normativi del CSM. Rassegna Parlamentare, Napoli, vol. 52, n. 2, p. 369-386, abr./jun. 2010.
SALVATO, Luigi. L’art. 134 della Costituzione. La Magistratura, Roma, 8 de julho de 2022.
VERDE, Giuseppe. L’emergere dell’autonomia normativa del CSM (notazioni a margine del dibattito sulla riforma dell’ordinamento giudiziario). Giurcost.org, Genova, vol. 3, p. 796-804, set./dez. 2021.
ZANON, Nicolò; BIONDI, Francesca (Coord). Il sistema costituzionale della magistratura. 5. ed. Bologna: Zanichelli, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Cristiano Celone

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the A&C - Administrative & Constitutional Law Review the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see theEffect of Open Access).